Hasil pencarian

A SEMANTIC ANALYSIS ON METAPHOR IN SOUTH AMANATUN DIALECT OF UAB METO

Semantics is commonly known as the study of meaning in a language. This Study Entitled: “A SEMANTIC ANALYSIS OF METAPHOR IN SOUTH AMANATUN DIALECT OF UAB METO”. This research analyzed about semantic analysis of metaphor found in South Amanatun Dialect of Uab Meto”. The purposes of this research are: (1) Identifying the types of metaphor which are found in South Amanatun Dialect” and (2) identifying the dominant types of metaphor in South Amanatun Dialect of Uab Meto. This research is analyzed by using descriptive qualitative method because the writer uses description based on the quality comprehensive in the analysis. Based on the metaphor classification the theory of Ullman, 2009: 266-270, the writer found that there are four types of metaphor in South Amanatun Dialect including Concrete to Abstract Metaphors, Anthropomorphic Metaphors, Synesthetic Metaphors, and Animal Metaphors. Meanwhile the writer also found that the dominant type of metaphor is concrete to abstract metaphors with the number 12 Sentences, followed by the Anthropomorphic Metaphors and Synesthetic Metaphors are 5 sentences for each type, and the last type is Animal Metaphor. The results of this research could be extra information in studying semantic meaning that focused on metaphor, forms of metaphor, and metaphorical meanings.

A STUDY ON SEMANTIC MEANING OF LYRICS IN HOLE A TRADITIONAL SONG OF RITUAL CEREMONY AFTER HARVEST IN SABUNESE CULTURE

A STUDY ON SEMANTIC MEANING OF LYRICS IN HOLE A TRADITIONAL SONG OF RITUAL CEREMONY AFTER HARVEST IN SABUNESE CULTURE ABSTRACT Student, Name1 Supervisor1, Name.2 Supervisor2,Name.3 (Litra S. Lay Tude) (Erny S.N.Hambandima, S.Pd., M.Pd ) (Seprianus A. Nanotek, S.Pd., M.Pd) This research is a study on semantic meaning of lyrics in hole a traditional song of ritual ceremony after harvest in sabunese culture. There one of research problem namely what are the types of semantic meaning of lyrics in Hole. The aim of this research were to find out types of semantic meaning of lyrics in Hole. The data was taken from one person as informant using the note-taking and applied documentation as the data collection. Based on the analysis the lyrics hole, there are four types of semantic meaning. The first is conceptual meaning, for example, conceptual meaning, I,e: This rice will thrive, and we will use it as a sign of a successful harvest. Ne are nade do ta muri nga merede. connotative meaning,I,e: Moba’ni nadu mi manu. That naughty girl/chicken. collocative meaning,I,e: rowi kolo loro mone lamma. For male offspiring. thematic meaning,I,e: mita nyale ta pelam’me ne are wie hab’ba rai lowe. In order to be divided rice for all hab’ba people. The conclusion is there are four types of semantic meaning of Hole which are conceptual meaning, connotative meaning, collocative meaning, thematic meaning. While, there is three type that is not found in Hole Lyrics song, namely reflective meaning. stylistic meaning, affective meaning, and reflected meaning. Keywords: Semantic, analysis, meaning, Hole, types of semantic meaning.

A SEMANTIC ANALYSIS ON SUMBANESE THREE TRADITIONAL SONGS

penelitian ini dilakukan untuk menjawab dua pertayaan: 1) Apa jenis makna yang ditemukan dalam lirik lagu daerah sumba? 2) apa fungsi yang ditemukan pada lirik lagu daerah sumba? Penulisan ini berfokus pada makna dan fungsi lagu sumba penelitian ini adalah semua lirik dan kalimat dari tiga lirik lagu sumba penulisan menggunakan metode kualitatif, dimana datanya ada pada lirik ketiga lagu yang memeliki makna dalam liriknya data dianalis secara kualitatif berdasarkan analisis diketahui bahwa dua jenis makna yang yang satu ini yaitu makna lexical dan kontextual, sedangkan fungsi lagu adalah mendidik, menghibur dan menasehati sebagai nilai moral

SEMANTIC ANALYSIS ON SOLE OHA SONG IN LEWOBELE VILLAGE OF ADONARA ISLAND

ABSTRACT This thesis is entitled” Semantic Analysis On Sole Oha Song in Lewobele Village of Adonara Island”. The problems of the study are (1) What are the types of meaning found in Sole Oha song? (2) What is the dominant type found in sole oha song? The objectives of the study are to find out types of meaning in sole oha song. To find out the dominant type found in Sole Oha song. To analyze the data of this study, the writer used the descriptive qualitative method. The instrument used is a documentary (Internet). The result of this research showed that in Sole Oha song there are five types of meaning and one dominant type are found in the Sole Oha lyrics. it is conceptual meaning, connotative meaning, stylistic meaning, collocative meaning, and thematic meaning. There are twenty-four substantial found in conceptual meaning ,i.e. ana, hama-hama ,doan, peten, jaga, lewo, pita, nete, oneng, ina ,ama, jodoh, marin, take, nalan, kila, ,bosa, pana, na’e, suku, ku’at, witi, sare, koda Six substantial found in connotative meaning, i.e lewo pulo, tana lema, miteng gemilin, iru koro, ati ladan, tewo lolon, sita sina, lera wulan. Two substantial found in stylistic meaning, i.e Teti, Lali. Four substansial found in collocative meaning, i,e Benga Olha pai arik saren,sedon miten gemilin, puken lera wulan ta’o jodoh kae, na keropon ata bura manure, iru koro lu’o lolon. Three substansial found in Thematic Meaning i.e Ti na nai sedon,nete bosa wu’ung to’u na’ang neiro, Ti na nete kila na’eng na’ang kuat kemuhang jodoh ra’eng, Na suka sedon ata bura manure. Based on the result of the study, the writer suggests the following. (1) For the theory of linguistics, the result of this study can be good information for the stock of the linguistics theory, especially in semantic analysis on sole oha song in Lewobele village. (2) For linguistics, the result of this study can be good information for the linguistics about linguistics history. (3) Village, The result in this study may become useful information for people in Lewobele village in dealing with the sole oha traditional song and to raise awareness to preserve the traditional song of sole oha. Key words: Analysis, Semantic, Sole Oha song.

ANALISIS SEMANTIK MENGENAI METAFORDALAM DIALEK AMANATUN BAHASA DAWAN (UAB METO)

Semantics is commonly known as the study of meaning in a language. This Study Entitled: “A SEMANTIC ANALYSIS OF METAPHOR IN THE NORTH AMANATUND IALECT OF UAB METO”. This research analyzed about semantic analysis ofmetaphor found in South Amanatun Dialect of Uab Meto”. The purposes of this research are: (1) Identifying the types of metaphor which are found in South Amanatun Dialect” and (2) identifying the dominant types of metaphor in South Amanatun Dialect of Uab Meto. This research is analyzed by using descriptive qualitative method because the writer uses description based on the quality comprehensive in the analysis. Based on the metaphor classification the theory of Ullman, 2009: 266-270, the writer found that there are four types of metaphor in South Amanatun Dialect including Concrete to Abstract Metaphors, Anthropomorphic Metaphors, Synesthetic Metaphors, and Animal Metaphors. Meanwhile the writer also found that the dominant type of metaphor is concrete to abstract metaphors with the number 12 Sentences, followed by the Anthropomorphic Metaphors and Synesthetic Metaphors are 5 sentences for each type, and the last type is Animal Metaphor. The results of this research could be extra information in studying semantic meaning that focused on metaphor, forms of metaphor, and metaphorical meanings.

Considering Pragma-Dialectics

Considering Pragma-Dialectics honors the monumental contributions of one of the foremost international figures in current argumentation scholarship: Frans van Eemeren. The volume presents the research efforts of his colleagues and addresses how their work relates to the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation with which van Eemeren’s name is so intimately connected. This tribute serves to highlight the varied approaches to the study of argumentation and is destined to inspire researchers to advance scholarship in the field far into the future. Replete with contributions from highly-esteemed academics in argumentation study, chapters in this volume address such topics as: *Pragma-dialectic versus epistemic theories of arguing and arguments; *Pragma-dialectics and self-advocacy in physician-patient interactions; *The pragma-dialectical analysis of the ad hominem family; *Rhetoric, dialectic, and the functions of argument; and *The semantics of reasonableness. As an exceptional volume and a fitting tribute, this work will be of interest to all argumentation scholars considering the astute insights and scholarly legacy of Frans van Eemeren.

Keeping in Touch With Pragma-Dialectics

"Keeping in touch with Pragma-Dialectics" is written to honor Frans van Eemeren and his work in the field of argumentation theory on the occasion of his retirement. The volume contains 17 contributions from teams of authors consisting of a combination of a pragma-dialectician and one or two researchers with a different background in the field of argumentation. In this volume, comparisons between the pragma-dialectical approach and other approaches are made, aspects of strategic maneuvering such as the use of presentational techniques, adaptation to the audience and the selection of topics are dealt with and the influence of specific institutional contexts such as politics, medicine and internet forums on strategic maneuvering are discussed.

Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics

Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics contains a selection of 18 article reporting on research conducted in the past decade in which the institutional context in which argumentative discourse takes place is systematically taken into account. Some articles provide relevant theoretical backgrounds, other articles make clear how the extended pragma-dialectical theory can be used to analyse and evaluate argumentative discourse in specific institutional contexts. Next to argumentative discourse in the legal domain and the medical context of health communication, a great deal of attention is paid to various argumentative practices in the political domain or dealing with specific social issues. A contribution on multimodal argumentation is also included. All contributing authors are actively engaged in the International Learned Institute for Argumentation Studies (ILIAS).

Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective

The book offers a compact but comprehensive introductory overview of the crucial components of argumentation theory. In presenting this overview, argumentation is consistently approached from a pragma-dialectical perspective by viewing it pragmatically as a goal-directed communicative activity and dialectically as part of a regulated critical exchange aimed at resolving a difference of opinion. As a result, the book also systematically explains how the constitutive parts of the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation, which are discussed in a number of separate publications, hang together. The following crucial topics are discussed: (1) argumentation theory as a discipline; (2) the meta-theoretical principles of pragma-dialectics; (3) the model of a critical discussion aimed at resolving a difference of opinion; (4) fallacies as violations of a code of conduct for reasonable argumentative discourse; (5) descriptive research of argumentative reality; (6) analysis as theoretically-motivated reconstruction; (7) strategic manoeuvring aimed at combining achieving effectiveness with maintaining reasonableness; (8) the conventionalization of argumentative practices; (9) prototypical argumentative patterns; (10) pragma-dialectics amidst other approaches. Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective is clearly written and makes argumentation theory understandable to all scholars and advanced students interested in argumentation research.

A Pragma-stylistic Study of Trump's Tweets in 2018

Academic Paper from the year 2021 in the subject German Studies - Semiotics, Pragmatics, Semantics, University of Babylon, language: English, abstract: The present study is concerned with pragma-stylistically analyzing Trump's tweets. It aims at investigating the use and frequencies of the pragmatic components, namely, speech acts, politeness and impoliteness strategies, Grice's maxims and referring expressions, which are utilized by Trump in his tweets in 2018. Both linguistic and nonlinguistic factors are taken into consideration when approaching the tweets under scrutinizing. An eclectic model is proposed by the study to conduct a qualitative pragma-stylistic analysis. Frequencies and percentages are also utilized to describe the results quantitatively. The findings of the analysis indicate that the pragmatic components which are frequently employed by Trump are representative speech acts, positive politeness strategies, positive impoliteness strategies, flouting the maxim of quality and definite expressions.

Algorithmic Differentiation of Pragma-Defined Parallel Regions

Numerical programs often use parallel programming techniques such as OpenMP to compute the program's output values as efficient as possible. In addition, derivative values of these output values with respect to certain input values play a crucial role. To achieve code that computes not only the output values simultaneously but also the derivative values, this work introduces several source-to-source transformation rules. These rules are based on a technique called algorithmic differentiation. The main focus of this work lies on the important reverse mode of algorithmic differentiation. The inherent data-flow reversal of the reverse mode must be handled properly during the transformation. The first part of the work examines the transformations in a very general way since pragma-based parallel regions occur in many different kinds such as OpenMP, OpenACC, and Intel Phi. The second part describes the transformation rules of the most important OpenMP constructs.

Pragma-sémantique de la Modalité

Argumentación y pragma-dialéctica

El florecimiento del campo de los estudios sobre argumentación en lasúltimas cinco décadas es sin duda uno de los fenómenos intelectualesde mayor interés. Al igual que cualquier otro campo de estudios, elprogreso depende del desarrollo de la teoría. En el caso de laargumentación, existe un consenso general de que la teoría másavanzada, por no decir la única propiamente dicha, es lapragma-dialéctica. Esta teoría fue formulada inicialmente a principios delos años 80 en la Universidad de Amsterdam, y desde entonces hacontinuado desarrollándose en un amplísimo programa de investigaciónen el que han participado investigadores de todos los países en que setoma en serio la argumentación. El líder indiscutido del programapragma-dialéctico de investigación es el profesor Dr. Frans H. vanEemeren, quien es reconocido como la figura señera de los estudiossobre argumentación en el mundo. Dado que algunos de sus discípulosprovienen de países de habla hispana, se han traducido ya cuatro de suslibros más importantes, pero no existía hasta ahora una colección deartículos suyos que dieran una idea más cabal de la extraordinariaamplitud y profundidad de todo el programa de investigación. Este librose propone cumplir así con tres objetivos: honrar la persona y obra deFrans van Eemeren, editar una antología representativa de sus artículosy convocar a todos los especialistas de habla hispana a que expongansus posiciones acerca de la pragma-dialéctica en el contexto de losestudios sobre argumentación.

Pragma (Grec). Quadern d'exercicis

Fonaments del mètode Pragma: a) Adaptació al moment present: s'han tingut en compte les innovacions didàctiques i metodològiques incorporades durant els últims anys a l'ensenyament de la nostra disciplina i a les d'assignatures afins, sobretot de l'àrea lingüística. b) Prioritat absoluta de l'ús de la llengua sobre el coneixement de la gramàtica. Es tracta d'un mètode no paradigmàtic que intenta arribar al coneixement de la llengua a través de la pràctica constant de la mateixa, i no a partir d'unes teoritzacions gramaticals prèvies. c) És un mètode inductiu i actiu: el/l'estudiant, sota la direcció|adreça del professorat, analitzarà i estudiarà sobre el text les diversos fets lingüístics, que posteriorment sistematitzarà. És, doncs, el propi alumnat el que "construeix" la gramàtica. d) Freqüència i rendibilitat: l'aprenentatge de la llengua es realitza tenint en compte la freqüència dels diversos elements lingüístics. Es considera, per tant, prioritari l'aprenentatge d'aquelles formes o estructures que hi ha major probabilitat de trobar a qualsevol obra grega, i es posposa o rebutja el que és infreqüent i, per tant, poc rendible. e) Progressió: la matèria és organitzada d'una manera gradual i progressiva, de menor a major dificultat, segons els criteris que la nostra experiència ens ha suggerit. f) Àmplia selecció de texts: encara que es dóna prioritat a la prosa àtica clàssica, tanmateix s'inclouen al nostre Manual texts de qualsevol autor i època, sempre que presentin un contingut interessant i una dificultat apropiada per a aquesta etapa inicial de l'estudi del grec. g) Texts originals i motivadors: es dóna preferència als texts originals, si bé ha estat inevitable modificar lleugerament o adaptar, sobretot en els primers temes, alguns texts interessants que, de no ser retocats, haguessin plantejat excessives dificultats al nostre alumnat. D'altra banda, hem preferit les màximes, anècdotes, històries breus... als tradicionals texts bèl·lics, fàbules... que resulten poc motivadors per a joves de setze o disset anys. h) Mètode exclusivament de llengua: es tracta d'un mètode de llengua, complementat amb els temes de cultura que exigeix el programa oficial. Encara que els fragments ofereixen nombrosos suggeriments per al comentari de múltiples aspectes de la civilització grega, tanmateix entenem que l'estudi de la cultura s'ha de fer d'una manera més profunda i sistemàtica.

Studies in Pragma-dialectics

Pragma (Grec) Batxillerat + Quadern d'exercicis

Fonaments del mètode Pragma: a) Adaptació al moment present: s'han tingut en compte les innovacions didàctiques i metodològiques incorporades durant els últims anys a l'ensenyament de la nostra disciplina i a les d'assignatures afins, sobretot de l'àrea lingüística. b) Prioritat absoluta de l'ús de la llengua sobre el coneixement de la gramàtica. Es tracta d'un mètode no paradigmàtic que intenta arribar al coneixement de la llengua a través de la pràctica constant de la mateixa, i no a partir d'unes teoritzacions gramaticals prèvies. c) És un mètode inductiu i actiu: el/l'estudiant, sota la direcció|adreça del professorat, analitzarà i estudiarà sobre el text les diversos fets lingüístics, que posteriorment sistematitzarà. És, doncs, el propi alumnat el que "construeix" la gramàtica. d) Freqüència i rendibilitat: l'aprenentatge de la llengua es realitza tenint en compte la freqüència dels diversos elements lingüístics. Es considera, per tant, prioritari l'aprenentatge d'aquelles formes o estructures que hi ha major probabilitat de trobar a qualsevol obra grega, i es posposa o rebutja el que és infreqüent i, per tant, poc rendible. e) Progressió: la matèria és organitzada d'una manera gradual i progressiva, de menor a major dificultat, segons els criteris que la nostra experiència ens ha suggerit. f) Àmplia selecció de texts: encara que es dóna prioritat a la prosa àtica clàssica, tanmateix s'inclouen al nostre Manual texts de qualsevol autor i època, sempre que presentin un contingut interessant i una dificultat apropiada per a aquesta etapa inicial de l'estudi del grec. g) Texts originals i motivadors: es dóna preferència als texts originals, si bé ha estat inevitable modificar lleugerament o adaptar, sobretot en els primers temes, alguns texts interessants que, de no ser retocats, haguessin plantejat excessives dificultats al nostre alumnat. D'altra banda, hem preferit les màximes, anècdotes, històries breus... als tradicionals texts bèl·lics, fàbules... que resulten poc motivadors per a joves de setze o disset anys. h) Mètode exclusivament de llengua: es tracta d'un mètode de llengua, complementat amb els temes de cultura que exigeix el programa oficial. Encara que els fragments ofereixen nombrosos suggeriments per al comentari de múltiples aspectes de la civilització grega, tanmateix entenem que l'estudi de la cultura s'ha de fer d'una manera més profunda i sistemàtica.

Anaphores pronominales et nominales

This volume presents a series of studies which analyze the anaphoric relationship in French from a non-traditional angle. Concentrating on indirect anaphora and bridging phenomena rather than on "classical" anaphoric expressions whose referent does not change, they analyze the anaphoric use of expressions such as I'un / l'autre, le premier / le second and le même rather than the well-known pronouns and noun phrases. Furthermore, they look at the anaphorical functioning of expressions such as en or ça in order to get a better grasp of their nature and use rather than having it the other way around. In doing so, these studies exemplify some of the new approaches which are adopted in current research on anaphora and .for this reason they will appeal to all those who are interested in the semantic structure of the anaphoric and referential expressions and in the different ways in which these expressions are used to construct coherent texts and discourses, in combination with pragmatic and cognitive mechanisms and strategies. Les études réunies dans ce volume présentent des approches de la relation anaphorique en français qui s'écartent toutes dans une certaine mesure des recherches traditionnelles". Elles s'intéressent ainsi aux anaphores indirectes ou non fidèles, plutôt qu'aux anaphores fidèles, analysent le fonctionnement anaphorique d'expressions comme l'un / l'autre, le premier / le second et le même, plutôt que des pronoms et syntagmes nominaux, ou exploitent le comportement anaphorique d'expressions comme en et ça pour mieux comprendre leur nature et leur emploi, plutôt que l'inverse. Elles reflètent ainsi les nouveaux chemins que tente d'emprunter la recherche actuelle sur les anaphores et pourront de ce fait intéresser tous ceux qui s'occupent de l'analyse de la structure sémantique des expressions anaphoriques et référentielles, et qui étudient la façon dont celles-ci participent, en combinaison avec des mécanismes pragmatiques et cognitifs, à la construction de textes et de discours.

Recherches en pragma-sémantique

Considering Pragma-Dialectics

Considering Pragma-Dialectics honors the monumental contributions of one of the foremost international figures in current argumentation scholarship: Frans van Eemeren. The volume presents the research efforts of his colleagues and addresses how their work relates to the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation with which van Eemeren’s name is so intimately connected. This tribute serves to highlight the varied approaches to the study of argumentation and is destined to inspire researchers to advance scholarship in the field far into the future. Replete with contributions from highly-esteemed academics in argumentation study, chapters in this volume address such topics as: *Pragma-dialectic versus epistemic theories of arguing and arguments; *Pragma-dialectics and self-advocacy in physician-patient interactions; *The pragma-dialectical analysis of the ad hominem family; *Rhetoric, dialectic, and the functions of argument; and *The semantics of reasonableness. As an exceptional volume and a fitting tribute, this work will be of interest to all argumentation scholars considering the astute insights and scholarly legacy of Frans van Eemeren.

A semantic analysis on associtive meaning of traditional poetries in Tetun language at Malaka regency

ABSTRACT This research entitles A semantic analysis on associtive meaning of traditional poetries in Tetun language at Malaka regency. The purpose of this research is to find out the types of associative meaning, and the function of each types of associative meaning of traditional poetry in Tetun language at Malaka regency. The method used in this research was descriptive qualitative method. The theory used in the research was the theory of associative meaning by Leech in semantic study of meaning. The result five types of associative meaning, there are 1. connocative meaning, Silu nola lain ida nodi namina ama wehali nain wehali nodimina ina wehali, 2. Social meaning, Ami ata fafudi ne kwer e lale ,3. Affective meaning, neon fo ba malu , 4. Rerflective meaning, Len nu loro foin taba and 5. Collocative meaning, lia diak. The function of connocative The word means is because they are usually defined conceptually which have features in real world. The word here show the real word of king. The function of social meaning is to show the new sense of one expressions. In the example show the difference dialect beetwen a normal human and human in kingdom. The function of affective meaning is in this phrase show the emosion of poet who asking for his parent to teach him to always love each other. The function of reflected meaning is show the feeling of poet’s feture life who light like sunshine. The function of collocative meaning is was used with another adjective to express an emotion as in sentence above. So, the phrase “good voice” is more suitable for this context